Homeomorphism: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== Properties == | == Properties == | ||
{{Property|property=The composition of two homeomorphisms is again a homeomorphism.}}{{Proof|proof=Let <math>f | {{Property|property=The composition of two homeomorphisms is again a homeomorphism.}} | ||
{{Proof|proof=Let <math>f\colon X \to Y</math> and <math>g\colon Y \to Z</math> be homeomorphisms. Then: | |||
* <math>g \circ f | * <math>g \circ f\colon X \to Z</math> is bijective, since the composition of two bijections is a bijection. | ||
* <math>g \circ f</math> is continuous, as the composition of two continuous functions. | * <math>g \circ f</math> is continuous, as the composition of two continuous functions. | ||
| Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
Thus <math>g \circ f</math> satisfies all requirements of a homeomorphism.}} | Thus <math>g \circ f</math> satisfies all requirements of a homeomorphism.}} | ||
{{Proof|title=Proof via universal property | |||
|proof=The following commutative diagrams exhibit <math>f</math> as an isomorphism: | |||
<div style="display: flex; justify-content: center; gap: 40px;"> | |||
<kroki lang="tikz"> | |||
\documentclass[tikz]{standalone} | |||
\usepackage{tikz-cd} | |||
\begin{document} | |||
\begin{tikzpicture}[baseline=(current bounding box.center)] | |||
\node[scale=1.5] { | |||
\begin{tikzcd} | |||
X \arrow[r,"f"] \arrow[rd,"\mathrm{id}_X"'] & Y \arrow[d,"f^{-1}"]\\ | |||
& X | |||
\end{tikzcd} | |||
}; | |||
\end{tikzpicture} | |||
\end{document} | |||
</kroki> | |||
<kroki lang="tikz"> | |||
\documentclass[tikz]{standalone} | |||
\usepackage{tikz-cd} | |||
\begin{document} | |||
\begin{tikzpicture}[baseline=(current bounding box.center)] | |||
\node[scale=1.5] { | |||
\begin{tikzcd} | |||
Y \arrow[r,"f^{-1}"] \arrow[rd,"\mathrm{id}_Y"'] & X \arrow[d,"f"]\\ | |||
& Y | |||
\end{tikzcd} | |||
}; | |||
\end{tikzpicture} | |||
\end{document} | |||
</kroki> | |||
</div> | |||
And the following commmutative diagrams are for <math>g</math>: | |||
<div style="display: flex; justify-content: center; gap: 40px;"> | |||
<kroki lang="tikz"> | |||
\documentclass[tikz]{standalone} | |||
\usepackage{tikz-cd} | |||
\begin{document} | |||
\begin{tikzpicture}[baseline=(current bounding box.center)] | |||
\node[scale=1.5] { | |||
\begin{tikzcd} | |||
Y \arrow[r,"g"] \arrow[rd,"\mathrm{id}_Y"'] & Z \arrow[d,"g^{-1}"]\\ | |||
& Y | |||
\end{tikzcd} | |||
}; | |||
\end{tikzpicture} | |||
\end{document} | |||
</kroki> | |||
<kroki lang="tikz"> | |||
\documentclass[tikz]{standalone} | |||
\usepackage{tikz-cd} | |||
\begin{document} | |||
\begin{tikzpicture}[baseline=(current bounding box.center)] | |||
\node[scale=1.5] { | |||
\begin{tikzcd} | |||
Z \arrow[r,"g^{-1}"] \arrow[rd,"\mathrm{id}_Z"'] & Y \arrow[d,"g"]\\ | |||
& Z | |||
\end{tikzcd} | |||
}; | |||
\end{tikzpicture} | |||
\end{document} | |||
</kroki> | |||
</div> | |||
Note that the commutative triangles for <math>f</math> and <math>g</math> paste to yeild the commutative triangle for <math>g\circ f</math>: | |||
<div style="display: flex; justify-content: center; gap: 40px;"> | |||
<kroki lang="tikz"> | |||
\documentclass[tikz]{standalone} | |||
\usepackage{tikz-cd} | |||
\begin{document} | |||
\begin{tikzpicture}[baseline=(current bounding box.center)] | |||
\node[scale=1.3] { | |||
\begin{tikzcd} | |||
& Y && \\ | |||
X && Z \\ | |||
&&& Y \\ | |||
&& X | |||
\arrow["g", from=1-2, to=2-3] | |||
\arrow["f", from=2-1, to=1-2] | |||
\arrow["{g\circ f}", from=2-1, to=2-3] | |||
\arrow["{\mathrm{id}_X}"', from=2-1, to=4-3] | |||
\arrow["{g^{-1}}", from=2-3, to=3-4] | |||
\arrow["{f^{-1}\circ g^{-1}}", from=2-3, to=4-3] | |||
\arrow["{f^{-1}}", from=3-4, to=4-3] | |||
\end{tikzcd}}; | |||
\end{tikzpicture} | |||
\end{document} | |||
</kroki> | |||
<kroki lang="tikz"> | |||
\documentclass[tikz]{standalone} | |||
\usepackage{tikz-cd} | |||
\begin{document} | |||
\begin{tikzpicture}[baseline=(current bounding box.center)] | |||
\node[scale=1.3] { | |||
\begin{tikzcd} | |||
& Y && \\ | |||
Z && X \\ | |||
&&& Y \\ | |||
&& Z | |||
\arrow["{f^{-1}}", from=1-2, to=2-3] | |||
\arrow["{g^{-1}}", from=2-1, to=1-2] | |||
\arrow["{(g\circ f)^{-1}}", from=2-1, to=2-3] | |||
\arrow["{\mathrm{id}_Z}"', from=2-1, to=4-3] | |||
\arrow["f", from=2-3, to=3-4] | |||
\arrow["{g\circ f}", from=2-3, to=4-3] | |||
\arrow["g", from=3-4, to=4-3] | |||
\end{tikzcd}}; | |||
\end{tikzpicture} | |||
\end{document} | |||
</kroki> | |||
</div> | |||
}} | |||
{{Property|property=The inverse of a homeomorphism is again a homeomorphism.}} | {{Property|property=The inverse of a homeomorphism is again a homeomorphism.}} | ||
{{Proof|proof=Let <math>f | {{Proof|proof=Let <math>f\colon X \to Y</math> be a homeomorphism. Then: | ||
* <math>f^{-1}</math> is continuous by definition, | * <math>f^{-1}</math> is continuous by definition, | ||
* <math>f^{-1}</math> is bijective, since the inverse of a bijection is again a bijection, | * <math>f^{-1}</math> is bijective, since the inverse of a bijection is again a bijection, | ||
| Line 38: | Line 151: | ||
{{Proof|proof= | {{Proof|proof= | ||
* '''Reflexivity''': The identity map <math>\operatorname{id}_X | * '''Reflexivity''': The identity map <math>\operatorname{id}_X\colon X\to X</math> is a continuous bijection on any topological space <math>X</math>, whose inverse is itself. Thus <math>\operatorname{id}_X</math> is a homeomorphism. | ||
* '''Symmetry''': If <math>f | * '''Symmetry''': If <math>f\colon X\to Y</math> is a homeomorphism, then its inverse <math>f^{-1}\colon Y\to X</math> is again a homeomorphism. | ||
* '''Transitivity''': If <math>f | * '''Transitivity''': If <math>f\colon X\to Y</math> and <math>g\colon Y\to Z</math> are homeomorphisms, then <math>g\circ f: X\to Z</math> is again a homeomorphism. | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 47: | Line 160: | ||
=== Open interval === | === Open interval === | ||
The [[open interval]] <math>(0,1)</math> is homeomorphic to <math>\mathbb{R}</math>. | The [[open interval]] <math>(0,1)</math> is homeomorphic to <math>\mathbb{R}</math>. | ||
{{Proof|proof=The map <math>f | {{Proof|proof=The map <math>f\colon (0,1)\to \mathbb{R}</math> defined by | ||
<math display="block">f(x)=\tan\left(\pi\left(x-\dfrac12\right)\right)</math> | <math display="block">f(x)=\tan\left(\pi\left(x-\dfrac12\right)\right)</math> | ||
is a homeomorphism. Indeed, <math>f</math> is continuous because it is a composition of continuous functions. The restriction <math>\tan | is a homeomorphism. Indeed, <math>f</math> is continuous because it is a composition of continuous functions. The restriction <math>\tan\colon (-\pi/2,\pi/2)\to\mathbb{R}</math> is bijective with continuous inverse <math>\arctan\colon \mathbb{R}\to(-\pi/2,\pi/2)</math>. Therefore <math>f</math> is bijective and its inverse | ||
<math display="block">f^{-1}(y)=\dfrac1\pi\arctan(y)+\dfrac12</math> | <math display="block">f^{-1}(y)=\dfrac1\pi\arctan(y)+\dfrac12</math> | ||
is continuous. Thus <math>f</math> is a homeomorphism.}} | is continuous. Thus <math>f</math> is a homeomorphism.}} | ||
| Line 135: | Line 248: | ||
</kroki> | </kroki> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Define the [[stereographic projection]] <math>p | Define the [[stereographic projection]] <math>p\colon S^2 \setminus \{N\} \to \mathbb{R}^2</math> by | ||
<math display="block">p(x,y,z) = \left( \frac{x}{1-z}, \frac{y}{1-z} \right).</math> | <math display="block">p(x,y,z) = \left( \frac{x}{1-z}, \frac{y}{1-z} \right).</math> | ||
This map is continuous because it is a rational function with denominator nonzero (since <math>z<1</math> on <math>S^2\setminus\{N\}</math>). | This map is continuous because it is a rational function with denominator nonzero (since <math>z<1</math> on <math>S^2\setminus\{N\}</math>). | ||
The inverse map <math>p^{-1} | The inverse map <math>p^{-1}\colon \mathbb{R}^2 \to S^2 \setminus \{N\}</math> is given by | ||
<math display="block">p^{-1}(u,v) = \left( \frac{2u}{u^2+v^2+1}, \frac{2v}{u^2+v^2+1}, \frac{u^2+v^2-1}{u^2+v^2+1} \right).</math> | <math display="block">p^{-1}(u,v) = \left( \frac{2u}{u^2+v^2+1}, \frac{2v}{u^2+v^2+1}, \frac{u^2+v^2-1}{u^2+v^2+1} \right).</math> | ||
This is also continuous as a composition of continuous functions. One verifies that <math>p \circ p^{-1} = \text{id}_{\mathbb{R}^2}</math> and <math>p^{-1} \circ p = \operatorname{id}_{S^2\setminus\{N\}}</math> by direct substitution. Hence <math>p</math> is a homeomorphism. | This is also continuous as a composition of continuous functions. One verifies that <math>p \circ p^{-1} = \text{id}_{\mathbb{R}^2}</math> and <math>p^{-1} \circ p = \operatorname{id}_{S^2\setminus\{N\}}</math> by direct substitution. Hence <math>p</math> is a homeomorphism. | ||
| Line 147: | Line 260: | ||
The unit interval <math>[0,1]</math> with the endpoints identified (the quotient space <math>[0,1]/\sim</math> where <math>0\sim 1</math>) is homeomorphic to the circle <math>S^1</math>. | The unit interval <math>[0,1]</math> with the endpoints identified (the quotient space <math>[0,1]/\sim</math> where <math>0\sim 1</math>) is homeomorphic to the circle <math>S^1</math>. | ||
{{Proof|proof=Define the map <math>f | {{Proof|proof=Define the map <math>f\colon [0,1] \to S^1</math> by <math display="block">f(t)=(\cos(2\pi t), \sin(2\pi t)).</math> This map is continuous and [[Surjection|surjective]], and satisfies <math>f(0)=f(1)=(1,0)</math>. | ||
Consider the equivalence relation <math>\sim</math>, and let <math>q | Consider the equivalence relation <math>\sim</math>, and let <math>q\colon [0,1]\to [0,1]/\sim</math> be the [[quotient map]]. By the [[universal property]] of the quotient map, there exists a unique continuous map <math>\tilde{f}\colon [0,1]/\sim \to S^1</math> such that <math>\tilde{f} \circ q = f</math>; that is, the following diagram commutes: | ||
<div style="text-align: center;"> | <div style="text-align: center;"> | ||
| Line 247: | Line 360: | ||
<math>\mathbb{R}</math> is '''not''' homeomorphic to <math>\mathbb{R}^2</math>. | <math>\mathbb{R}</math> is '''not''' homeomorphic to <math>\mathbb{R}^2</math>. | ||
{{Proof|proof=For contradiction, suppose that there exists a homeomorphism <math>f | {{Proof|proof=For contradiction, suppose that there exists a homeomorphism <math>f\colon \mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^2</math>. | ||
Consider the subspace <math>\mathbb{R}\setminus\{0\}</math> of <math>\mathbb{R}</math>. The [[restriction]] on it, <math>\left.f\right|_{\mathbb{R}\setminus\{0\}} | Consider the subspace <math>\mathbb{R}\setminus\{0\}</math> of <math>\mathbb{R}</math>. The [[restriction]] on it, <math>\left.f\right|_{\mathbb{R}\setminus\{0\}}\colon \mathbb{R}\setminus\{0\}\to \mathbb{R}^2\setminus\{f(0)\}</math> is also a homeomorphism. | ||
However, <math>\mathbb{R}\setminus\{0\}</math> has two connected components, <math>(-\infty,0)</math> and <math>(0,\infty)</math>, while <math>\mathbb{R}^2\setminus\{f(0)\}</math> is connected, which contradicts the assumption that the two spaces are homeomorphic. | However, <math>\mathbb{R}\setminus\{0\}</math> has two connected components, <math>(-\infty,0)</math> and <math>(0,\infty)</math>, while <math>\mathbb{R}^2\setminus\{f(0)\}</math> is connected, which contradicts the assumption that the two spaces are homeomorphic. | ||
| Line 305: | Line 418: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Hence, no such homeomorphism exists; therefore <math>\mathbb{R}</math> is not homeomorphic to <math>\mathbb{R}^2</math>}}The map from the interval <math>[0,1)</math> to the 1-sphere <math>S^1</math>, | Hence, no such homeomorphism exists; therefore <math>\mathbb{R}</math> is not homeomorphic to <math>\mathbb{R}^2</math>}} | ||
<math display="block">\phi | |||
The map from the interval <math>[0,1)</math> to the 1-sphere <math>S^1</math>, | |||
<math display="block">\phi\colon [0,1)\to S^1,\quad x\mapsto e^{2\pi ix}</math> | |||
is continuous and bijective, but not a homeomorphism. | is continuous and bijective, but not a homeomorphism. | ||
{{Proof|proof= | {{Proof|proof= | ||
| Line 351: | Line 466: | ||
Consider the sequence<math display="block">z_n = e^{2\pi i (1-\tfrac{1}{n})} \in S^1.</math> | Consider the sequence<math display="block">z_n = e^{2\pi i (1-\tfrac{1}{n})} \in S^1.</math> | ||
Then <math>z_n \to 1 = e^{2\pi i \cdot 0}</math> in <math>S^1</math>. But | Then <math>z_n \to 1 = e^{2\pi i \cdot 0}</math> in <math>S^1</math>. But | ||
<math display="block">\phi^{-1}(z_n) = 1-\ | <math display="block">\phi^{-1}(z_n) = 1-\frac{1}{n} \to 1,</math> | ||
which does not converge to <math>\phi^{-1}(1)=0</math> in <math>[0,1)</math>. Thus <math>\phi^{-1}</math> is not continuous. | which does not converge to <math>\phi^{-1}(1)=0</math> in <math>[0,1)</math>. Thus <math>\phi^{-1}</math> is not continuous. | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Topological invariants == | == Topological invariants == | ||
A [[topological invariant]] is a property of a topological space that is preserved under homeomorphisms. In other words, if two spaces are homeomorphic, they either both possess the property or both do not. Invariants are the important tools to classify topological spaces. If two spaces differ in any topological invariant, they cannot be homeomorphic. Conversely, showing that two spaces share many invariants is often the first step on proving they are homeomorpic, though it is never sufficient by itself. | A [[topological invariant]] is a property of a topological space that is preserved under homeomorphisms. In other words, if two spaces are homeomorphic, they either both possess the property or both do not. Invariants are the important tools to classify topological spaces. If two spaces differ in any topological invariant, they cannot be homeomorphic. Conversely, showing that two spaces share many invariants is often the first step on proving they are homeomorpic, though it is never sufficient by itself. | ||
| Line 466: | Line 582: | ||
* [[Homeomorphism group]] | * [[Homeomorphism group]] | ||
[[Category: | ==Terminology== | ||
{{Terminology_table| | |||
{{Terminology_table/row | homeomorphism | homéomorphisme | Homeomorphismus | 同胚 | 同胚 | 同相写像 }} | |||
{{Terminology_table/row | homeomorphic | homéomorphe | homeomorph | 同胚的 | 同胚的 | 同相 }} | |||
{{Terminology_table/row | topological invariant | invariant topologique | topologische Invariante | 拓扑不变量 | 拓撲不變量 | 位相不変量 }} | |||
{{Terminology_table/row | autohomeomorphism | autohoméomorphisme | Selbsthomöomorphismus | 自同胚 | 自同胚 | 自己同相写像 }} | |||
{{Terminology_table/row | homeomorphism group | groupe des homéomorphismes | Homöomorphismengruppe | 同胚群 | 同胚群 | 同相群 }} | |||
}} | |||
[[Category:Topology]] | |||
Latest revision as of 13:59, 13 April 2026

A homeomorphism is a special type of function between two topological spaces, that establishes that the two spaces are fundamentally the same from a topological perspective. Specifically, it is a continuous bijective function whose inverse function is also continuous. Homeomorphisms are the isomorphisms in the category of topological spaces , which preserves all topological properties of a topological space. If such a function exists between two spaces, they are said to be homeomorphic.
Intuitively, two spaces are homeomorphic if one can be continuously deformed into the other by stretching, bending, and twisting, without cutting, tearing, or gluing. A typical intuitive example is that a mug with a handle is homeomorphic to a donut. This concept is distinct from homotopy equivalence, which allows deformations that involve collapsing. For instance, a solid ball can be continuously shrunk to a point by a homotopy, but such a deformation is not a homeomorphism because it is not bijective and the inverse would not be continuous.
Definitions
A function between topological spaces and is called a homeomorphism, if:
- is continuous,
- is bijective,
- is continuous.
Two topological spaces and are called homeomorphic if there exists a homeomorphism between them, denoted .
Equivalent Definitions
A homeomorphism is a bijection that is continuous and open, or continuous and closed.
Properties
The composition of two homeomorphisms is again a homeomorphism.
Let and be homeomorphisms. Then:
- is bijective, since the composition of two bijections is a bijection.
- is continuous, as the composition of two continuous functions.
- The inverse is , which is continuous because it is the composition of the continuous functions and .
Thus satisfies all requirements of a homeomorphism.
The following commutative diagrams exhibit as an isomorphism:
And the following commmutative diagrams are for :
Note that the commutative triangles for and paste to yeild the commutative triangle for :
The inverse of a homeomorphism is again a homeomorphism.
Let be a homeomorphism. Then:
- is continuous by definition,
- is bijective, since the inverse of a bijection is again a bijection,
- is continuous by definition.
Homeomorphism is an equivalence relation.
- Reflexivity: The identity map is a continuous bijection on any topological space , whose inverse is itself. Thus is a homeomorphism.
- Symmetry: If is a homeomorphism, then its inverse is again a homeomorphism.
- Transitivity: If and are homeomorphisms, then is again a homeomorphism.
Examples
Open interval
The open interval is homeomorphic to .
The map defined by is a homeomorphism. Indeed, is continuous because it is a composition of continuous functions. The restriction is bijective with continuous inverse . Therefore is bijective and its inverse is continuous. Thus is a homeomorphism.
Stereographic projection
The Euclidean plane is homeomorphic to the 2-sphere minus one point, denoted where is the north pole.
Define the stereographic projection by This map is continuous because it is a rational function with denominator nonzero (since on ).
The inverse map is given by This is also continuous as a composition of continuous functions. One verifies that and by direct substitution. Hence is a homeomorphism.
Quotient space
The unit interval with the endpoints identified (the quotient space where ) is homeomorphic to the circle .
Define the map by This map is continuous and surjective, and satisfies .
Consider the equivalence relation , and let be the quotient map. By the universal property of the quotient map, there exists a unique continuous map such that ; that is, the following diagram commutes:
The map is bijective because:
- Surjectivity follows from surjectivity of ;
- Injectivity holds because but in the latter case in the quotient.
Hence is a continuous bijection.
The space is compact as the quotient of a compact space, and is Hausdorff. By the Compact-to-Hausdorff theorem, a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism.
Therefore is a homeomorphism.
Counterexamples
is not homeomorphic to .
For contradiction, suppose that there exists a homeomorphism .
Consider the subspace of . The restriction on it, is also a homeomorphism.
However, has two connected components, and , while is connected, which contradicts the assumption that the two spaces are homeomorphic.
Hence, no such homeomorphism exists; therefore is not homeomorphic to
The map from the interval to the 1-sphere , is continuous and bijective, but not a homeomorphism.
The map is:
- Continuous, as it is the composition of continuous maps and .
- Injective, because if , then . Since , it follows that .
- Surjective, since every point of can be written as for some .
Hence is a continuous bijection.
However, is not a homeomorphism.
Consider the sequence Then in . But which does not converge to in . Thus is not continuous.
Topological invariants
A topological invariant is a property of a topological space that is preserved under homeomorphisms. In other words, if two spaces are homeomorphic, they either both possess the property or both do not. Invariants are the important tools to classify topological spaces. If two spaces differ in any topological invariant, they cannot be homeomorphic. Conversely, showing that two spaces share many invariants is often the first step on proving they are homeomorpic, though it is never sufficient by itself.
Common topological invariants
- Connectedness
- Compactness
- Hausdorff property
- Cardinality of the space
Algebraic invariants
More powerful invariants come from algebraic topology, which assigns algebraic objects to topological spaces.
Homeomorphism group
The collection of all autohomeomorphisms of a topological space forms a group under composition operation, known as the homeomorphism group of , denoted . The homeomorphism group captures the symmetry in topology. It describes the ways in which a topological space can be continuously transformed onto itself.
The homeomorphism group is a faithful group action on its underlying set . It moves points in continuously onto itself, and the topological structure of is also reflected in the algebraic invariants such as the orbits and stabilizers of the action.
For example, consider the 2-sphere as a thin rubber membrane tightly wraped around a ball. Each autohomeomorphism of , which is an element in , corresponds to a continuous deformation of this membrane. This operation can be stretching, bending, twisting, or any composition of these operations, so the rubber always remains attached to the ball.
Under the natural action of , every point on the sphere can be moved continuously to any other point. This example shows how the homeomorphism group captures the symmetry of a topological space in the perspective of continuity.
See also
Terminology
| en | fr | de | zh | ja | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| homeomorphism | homéomorphisme | Homeomorphismus | 同胚 | 同胚 | 同相写像 |
| homeomorphic | homéomorphe | homeomorph | 同胚的 | 同胚的 | 同相 |
| topological invariant | invariant topologique | topologische Invariante | 拓扑不变量 | 拓撲不變量 | 位相不変量 |
| autohomeomorphism | autohoméomorphisme | Selbsthomöomorphismus | 自同胚 | 自同胚 | 自己同相写像 |
| homeomorphism group | groupe des homéomorphismes | Homöomorphismengruppe | 同胚群 | 同胚群 | 同相群 |