Jump to content

Seifert-Van Kampen theorem: Difference between revisions

From Mathepedia, the mathematical encyclopedia
Created page with "== Statement == Let <math>X</math> be a topological space, and <math>U, V\subset X</math> be open sets such that <math>X = U\cup V</math>, and <math>U</math>, <math>V</math> and <math>U\cap V</math> are path-connected. Take a basepoint <math>x_0\in U\cap V</math> with inclusion maps: <math display="block">i\colon U\cap V\hookrightarrow U,\quad j\colon U\cap V\hookrightarrow V,\quad k\colon U\hookrightarrow X,\quad l\colon V\hookrightarrow X,</math> then the following d..."
 
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Statement ==
== Statement ==
Let <math>X</math> be a topological space, and <math>U, V\subset X</math> be open sets such that <math>X = U\cup V</math>, and <math>U</math>, <math>V</math> and <math>U\cap V</math> are path-connected. Take a basepoint <math>x_0\in U\cap V</math> with inclusion maps:
Let <math>X</math> be a topological space and let <math>\mathcal{U}=\{U_i\}_{i\in I}</math> be an open cover of <math>X</math>.


<math display="block">i\colon U\cap V\hookrightarrow U,\quad j\colon U\cap V\hookrightarrow V,\quad k\colon U\hookrightarrow X,\quad l\colon V\hookrightarrow X,</math>
Let <math>\mathcal{F}</math> be the set of all finite non-empty intersections of members of <math>\mathcal{U}</math>:
<math display="block">\mathcal{F}=\left\{\left.\bigcap_{i\in J}U_i\right|\varnothing\neq J\subseteq I, |J|<\infty\right\}</math>.


then the following diagram is a pushout:
Regard <math>\mathcal{F}</math> as a category whose objects are the elements of <math>\mathcal{F}</math> and in which there is a unique morphism <math>V\to W</math> whenever <math>V\subseteq W</math>.
<div style="display: flex; justify-content: center; gap: 40px;">
<kroki lang="tikz">
\documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
\usepackage{quiver}
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}[baseline=(current bounding box.center)] 
\node[scale=1.5] {
\begin{tikzcd}
{\pi_1(U\cap V,x_0)} & {\pi_1(U,x_0)} \\
{\pi_1(V,x_0)} & {\pi_1(X,x_0)}
\arrow["{i_*}", from=1-1, to=1-2]
\arrow["{j_*}"', from=1-1, to=2-1]
\arrow["{k_*}", from=1-2, to=2-2]
\arrow["{l_*}"', from=2-1, to=2-2]
\end{tikzcd}
  };
\end{tikzpicture}


\end{document}
Let <math>\Pi_1\colon \mathcal{F}\to \mathsf{Gpd}</math> be the functor that sends each <math>V\in \mathcal{F}</math> to its fundamental groupoid <math>\Pi_1(V)</math> and each inclusion <math>V\hookrightarrow W</math> to the induced morphism of groupoids.
</kroki>
 
</div>
Then the canonical morphism
<math display="block">\mathop{\operatorname{colim}}\limits_{V\in\mathcal{F}}\Pi_1(V)\to \Pi_1(X)</math>
is an isomorphism of groupoids.

Latest revision as of 11:25, 10 July 2026

Statement

Let LaTeX be a topological space and let LaTeX be an open cover of LaTeX.

Let LaTeX be the set of all finite non-empty intersections of members of LaTeX:

LaTeX

.

Regard LaTeX as a category whose objects are the elements of LaTeX and in which there is a unique morphism LaTeX whenever LaTeX.

Let LaTeX be the functor that sends each LaTeX to its fundamental groupoid LaTeX and each inclusion LaTeX to the induced morphism of groupoids.

Then the canonical morphism

LaTeX

is an isomorphism of groupoids.